On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:06:58PM +0200, Maurizio Pinotti wrote: > NRPE PROS: centralized configuration, less error prone
I contest this assertion. I'm setting up nrpe just now, and the fact that you effectively have to duplicate the configuration -- you have to define the check commands both in nrpe.cfg on the target, *and* in the .cfg file for that server on the monitoring server -- is one of the things that's bugging the crap out of me. I can see situations where it could be useful -- such as monitoring machines outside your administrative span of control -- but how often do you do that? I'm just not sure I can envision a *better* architecture for it, either... Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
