Morten Guldager wrote: > 'Aloha! > > How come that I get a warning if I omit the "check_period" on services while > it seems to be ok to leave it out on the hosts? >
Because it's something one normally wants to associate with a service. > It says: > Warning: Service 'check-stuff' on host 'nice-box' has no check time period > defined! > > > Will nagios act well defined if I simply ignore these warnings? For a given value of "well defined", yes ;-) > And how? > By checking the service as if you'd defined a timeperiod encompassing all the hours of all days (I think). It could also be by not checking the service at all, which one could argue is actually correct. Try and find out. -- Andreas Ericsson [email protected] OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
