Jon Angliss <j...@netdork.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:12:40 +0000 (UTC), "R. David Murray"
> <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
>
> >Jon Angliss <j...@netdork.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:03:46 +0000 (UTC), "R. David Murray"
> >> <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >This is weird. If I do this:
> >> >
> >> > >sudo -u nagios /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_procs -a "-L
> >> > /var/sipenv-10.1.2.1/log/b2bua.log" -C python -c 1:1
> >> > PROCS OK: 1 process with args '-L
> >> > /var/sipenv-10.1.2.1/log/b2bua.log', command name 'python'
> >> >
> >> >everything is fine, but if I do it remotely:
> >> >
> >> > >./check_nrpe -H 65.175.131.174 -c check_foo
> >> > PROCS CRITICAL: 0 processes with args '-L
> >> > /var/sipenv-10.1.2.1/log/b2bua.log', command name 'python'
> >> >
> >> >it can't find the process. It looks as though the string that check_cpu
> >> >is looking at is truncated when and only when it is run under nrpe.
> >> >
> >> >Anyone have any clues, especially thoughts on a workaround?
> >>
> >> What's your definition for check_foo from the nrpe? You mentioned
> >> check_procs in the first statement, check_foo in the command call, and
> >> check_cpu in the explanation of truncation... which is right? ;)
> >
> >The nrpe.cfg definition of check_foo is:
> >
> >command[check_foo]=/usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_procs -a "-L
> >/var/sipenv-10.1.2.1/log/b2bua.log" -C python -c 1:1
>
> Looks the same. Double checked the user running nrpe is really
> nagios? How about running "env -i" before testing the script locally
> to see if there are any issues with environment being loaded when
> executed remotely.
With this:
>sudo -u nagios env -i /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_procs -a "-L
/var/sipenv-10.1.2.1/log/b2bua.log" -C python -c 1:1
I get the same result: the process is found. As for the userid:
>ps auxww | grep nrpe
nagios 646 0.0 0.1 2568 1596 ?? Ss 4Feb09 6:49.40
/usr/local/sbin/nrpe2 -c /usr/local/etc/nrpe.cfg -d
> >The mention of check_cpu should be replaced with check_procs, sorry for the
> >typo.
>
> Figured that was what you meant ;)
Thanks for responding. Any other thoughts? I'm stuck and am considering
writing
a python script to replace check_procs as a workaround.
--David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations
Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of
expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry
leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf
and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
