On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/15/2009 12:52 AM, Martin Melin wrote: >> Have you tried leaving out the notification_period line from the >> service definition? I think, but don't have time to verify, that by >> saying "notification_period null" you are actually overriding all >> inherited values for notification_period and setting it to null >> instead. >> > > That's kind of the point. I want the service to inherit its > notification period from the hosts it checks. In order to do that, its > own notification period has to be null.
No, in order to do that, the notification_period needs to be unspecified. null != unspecified. Because you're explicitly setting it to null, you break the implied inheritance. To take advantage of the implied inheritance, you need to leave out the directive entirely as indicated above. -- Marc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null