This is kind of what I did when testing backup system.  I had a process
tailing the nagios.log and when it got incoming messages it would just
forward a copy to the other server so all but passive checks the
secondary system appeared to be the same as the primary.  Seemed to work
pretty well.

Dan

------------
You cannot - to the best of my knowledge - sync acknowledgments to a 
backup server while it's actively running, unless you want to write 
something that checks for new acks and dumps them into the command 
pipe.  So, if you want to maintain acks and downtime, you'll need to 
have your backup disabled for the syncs.

-- 
Mike Lindsey


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio
XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Reply via email to