On 05/17/2011 11:34 AM, Max Schubert wrote: > Andreas, > > How does this differ functionality from the current ability to > describe dependencies with servicedependency? Is it just easier to > define (I agree that would be a win) >
It's just easier to describe, and it ties in nicely with different additions to the configuration syntax being planned. It does have some limitations, but in 99.5% of all dependencies I've seen, it matches the usecase people put dependencies to so it should be quite a nice win anyway. -- Andreas Ericsson [email protected] OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
