Hi, i am thinking about the monitoring with dualstack targets/hosts. I'd expect all our hosts and services to be dual stacked or at least single stacked services to be the exception.
So adding a v6 host for all v4 hosts seems so odd. I was thinking about adding some _v6address variable to all host definitions and defining v6 services using host HOSTADDRESS but _HOSTV6ADDRESS. In the end it would even be more natural to check_ping to check both address families if available and go to CRITICAL if one of them fails. In the end v6 should be a equivalent member of the family. Whats the preferred way people have chosen and what where the pitfalls? Flo -- Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
