On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:12:23AM -0500, C. Bensend wrote: > I can't seem to parse "It doesn't make sense to get a recovery > notification for something you never knew was a problem."
see the original language here: http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/notifications.html Note: Notifications about host or service recoveries are only sent out if a notification was sent out for the original problem. It doesn't make sense to get a recovery notification for something you never knew was a problem. And: http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/escalations.html If, after three problem notifications, a recovery notification is sent out for the service, who gets notified? The recovery is actually the fourth notification that gets sent out. However, the escalation code is smart enough to realize that only those people who were notified about the problem on the third notification should be notified about the recovery. In this case, the nt-admins and managers contact groups would be notified of the recovery. (Although, I believe I've either misunderstood the implications of that statement, or run into misbehaviours in that area myself...) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
