Wuuhuuuu! Hi!! [email protected] (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote: |Steffen "Daode" Nurpmeso <[email protected]> writes: |> not at last because i don't know of any packaged S-nail. | |I assumed you were aware of this, but there is an OpenBSD port[1], which |has replaced[2] Heirloom mailx. We can of course integrate those patches |in the 14.2 port, so you don't need to post a maintenance release if |you don't want to. Just tell us if you change your opinion, so that |William (the port maintainer) or I don't submit a useless patch.
No i didn't know that! I call back when the hyperventilation stops… |[1] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=136452928921103&w=2 |[2] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=136452953721136&w=2 Grazy. So then maybe i should send the next minor release entirely in small appetizing patches… haha… No, hrm, no. (:) So this is something else. Question: what do you think is the best option? I could tag and release a 14.2.1 or so, but i would also be fine if you or William (cool!) would adjust that via DISTNAME (which i think was the mechanism, but i never made it to @openbsd.org ;). …And tomorrow OpenBSD 5.3 will be released! Hmm. Please let me know what you think! |-- |Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas |PGP Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494 --steffen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ nail-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nail-devel
