So what is the issue? Is it just the terminology or actually doing the massage? Keep the verbiage as it is. I think we should be able to massage any part of the body. With my licensing, the only part of the body that we did not do in school was the glutes! Rare is the MT that does my stomach and glutes. So what is their problem? My massage technique is relaxing and I fill in dead spots with them. Buenos dias, Lynnette Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message----- From: Diana Bonn <bonn.di...@att.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:35:03 To: <nailTech@googlegroups.com> Subject: NailTech:: question/massage/interpretation Any massage therapists on this list? Or to all nail techs/stylist question. Do you consider nail techs massaging the lower legs, foot, arms (to elbows) and hands part of massage therapist interpretation of your (degree, certification,license) or do you think that nail techs should be able to massage certain parts of the body? The same EXACT question for stylists concerning Scalp Massage? part of your (degree,certification, license)? Do you think that because you received training in massage at a "accredited school for massage" and nail techs/stylists aren't specifically trained in these areas that stylist/nailtechs should not massage? There is a situation that could happen in the future that some may try to remove the word "massage" in language concerning nail techs and stylists. diana from indiana --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NailTech" group. To post to this group, send email to NailTech@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nailtech+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/NailTech?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
