bject: primer opinions....Rhonda, I completely understand what you are 
saying. I DID have a hard time removing the SOG from the one finger that was 
demo'd to me in Chicago. It was primed with the primer pen. That IS acid 
primer.As for the verbiage on the bonders/primer.... Rox has a new client 
coming to her salon. She has it in HER mind that the PRIMER was the cause of 
damage. Rox needs to get her in her chair and gently let her know that it was 
the tech who did the damage followed by the wrong products. If the old type 
primer does do damage, then clients who patronize chop shops are having more 
damage done to them than they realize. Hence, this is where clients feel that 
the PRODUCT did the damage and not the person working on their nails. Educating 
the client will likely not be able to be done in one visit. That would be way 
too much information overload to the client. She already has it in her mind 
that the PRIMER was doing the damage. This has to be a slow process to get her 
to understand WHAT was done and learn what WILL be done from here on out by a 
reputable tech. Rox can be professional about it and not say anything negative 
about what was done or the products used at this client's first appointment. 
Rox needs to build up this woman's trust in what she is doing to her nails and 
the products she is using. To me, IMHO, that is what needs to be done at the 
first appointment. Over time, Rox can let her know that the bonder is doing the 
same thing, but is NOT harmful to her or her nails. I would never expect the 
client to absorb and retain all this information in one visit. Her main 
objective this time is to NOT have primer used and to walk out with beautiful 
nails. I vote to let her get this and slowly give her more information. What 
harm is it to NOT use "primer" instead of "bonder?" These newer bonders do not 
even use the term primer on their labels. They are distancing themselves from 
the primer terminology. Why? Because it is NOT a primer in the OLD sense. Does 
not etch or harm the nails, right?I see no harm in telling the client that that 
step is a bonder and it works similar to a double faced tape to keep the 
product to the nail and the nail to the product. I wonder how many chop shops 
have actually explained this step to their customers. I wonder how many nss can 
explain this--the upscale American owned and operated nss in my area use TT and 
CND. The chop shops use MMA. Now on to the SOG and "bonding" the free edge. I 
have been using SOG since November and never had the pulling away from the 
nails. I recently started doing it because my peers suggested it. It is not 
killing me to do it. Do I know if it is better? No, since like I said, I had no 
problems before. But I am taking your word for it!!I do not lie to my clients. 
I give them the information they need to know at the level they will 
understand. I cannot give them too much, because they will not comprehend it 
all at one time. The only difference is terminology. I use Something Wonderful, 
YN Protein Bond and Entity's NuBond. Primer and bonder are not the same thing. 
Like you said, primer etches and the bonder does not. Then it is NOT the same. 
So why use the same wording? The end result is the same, but the product is 
different. I guess it is all how one looks at it. --ROX-- sorry for talking 
about you as if you were not in the room!!! LOL  

 buenos dias,Gotta' run,
Lynnette
http://www.facebook.com/nailtech       Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NailTech" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nailtech?hl=en.

Reply via email to