Martin Hannigan wrote:

Not really tracks. A reduction in the littany of things that we're open
to receiving as input to content. A lot of it isn't relevant any longer.

Any guidance on how you define that relevance boundary?

One of my (personal) opinions is that if a talk belongs at another conference, it might not make sense at NANOG. Pretty soon though, I'm just going to another conference.

pt

Reply via email to