[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Awhile ago, we've had proposal to formally forbid autoresponders. The > proposed language was to add following to AUP: > > 8. Challenge/response sender whitelisting software which requires > interaction by any party to validate a post to the NANOG mailing list as > non-spam shall be treated by the list administration team like any other > condition that generates a bounce message. Subscribers with software > (such as but not limited to TMDA) that is (mis)configured in this fashion > are subject to removal from the list without notice, and are welcome to > resubscribe at such time as their software is fixed.
I support this. Software that responds to mess sent to a mailing list with challenge response or out of office messages is badly written and disruptive. > Then, the proposal bounced between MLC, -futures and SC with unclear > result (or rather, result being clear that it wasn't approved). I *think* > the latest revised version is above. > > So, if you have any objections to the above, please voice them. > > -alex >
