On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:22:10PM -0700, William B. Norton wrote:
[snip]
> I think the PC has a simple (but not necessarily easy) charge:
> put together the content/agenda for NANOG. A charter doesn't
> need to specify the how.
I agree that micromanagement of the PC is a bad thing. The
original intent seems to have been to provide a mandatory
participation bar, which would explain why it is coupled
with the 'meet too many meetings and you're out' portion.
While there are several good metrics possible (speakers/
talks/sessions solicited, talks reviewed, sessions led, etc),
I'm not sure if any need to be stipulated in the charter.
> Section 8.1 - Program
>
> .... Each member of the Program Committee must review all
> presentations submitted for each meeting.
>
> very simple vote - keep or don't keep this line.
Agreed.
jzp
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
