> Why can't the NANOG community identify and agree to adopt > some BCPs that the group generally feel are good ideas?
Why? I think the reason why NANOG cannot do this is that this kind of work is better done outside of a mailing list and the NANOG community has not shown much interest in doing it. NANOG folk set up a blog but virtually nobody contributed. There was (and still is) a best practices wiki out there but not much in the way of contribs. There was another wiki that was set up as part of the NANOG-FUTURES work, but that quickly fizzled. > For example, as was discussed on the nanog list, why not > identify a BCP for identifying the appropriate contact at an > organization? If you can't get a significant level of participation in writing such BCPs, then people won't buy into them and won't follow them. > The first step towards making things better is to identify > things that are broken and *a* generally agreed upon good solution. Agreed, but NANOG has repeatedly backed away from doing this kind of work. --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
