On 2008-03-02-18:05:11, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, I'm seeking some commentary on the following document that may > help us to make incremental improvements in the operation of the > mailing list. > > http://www.fugawi.net/~hannigan/nanog-mlcp1-1.pdf
For those of us following along at home, could you please explain the differences between this policy and what was presented in San Jose[1], if any? Is this PDF something put together by the MLC for community review, or something more casual in nature? Perhaps a bit disturbing is the part about permanently suspending a disruptive sender's posting privileges. I think I'd rather this remain a 6 (12?) month deal, even if it means you'll need to go through the motions to habitually "re-ban" some folk. In any event, I appreciate your putting this together in coherent written form and getting the dialogue going. -a [1] http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0802/presentations/community-pilosov.pdf _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
