On 17 Jun 2008, at 21:33, Steve Gibbard wrote: > Is the Outages list of interest to the NANOG community? Should NANOG, > which if I'm remembering correctly has a nice shiny new professionally > managed mail server take over the operation of the Outages list in > order > to improve its reliability?
For my money, there is value in a list concerned with the subset of NANOG on-topicness to be as operationally independent as possible from the NANOG list. (At an extreme example, which list would you use to discuss a blanket networking failure in Michigan if both lists were hosted in a2?) Joe _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
