On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:55:31PM -0800, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Would it make sense to have a nanog-test list so that people can test for > connectivity issues to the list instead of posting "is this thing on?" to > na...@. Seems to work pretty well for FreeBSD.
Not necessary. All lists are required by RFC 2142 to have a "-request" address -- and thankfully, most do. That address almost always suffices to check bidirectional mail delivery. (And in situations where it appears to be broken, "-owner" should reach the person(s) best situated to diagnose the problem.) ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
