> ------- [email protected] wrote: ---------- > From: Simon Lyall <[email protected]> > > Does anyone want to do a FAQ covering the issues as to why home users > should get a /64 vs /56 vs /48 etc? > -------------------------------------------
> ARIN is in effect forcing it by not giving even close to enough addresses > to give home users a /48. I just got my IPv6 allocation today and am <snip> > All the folks that are core in this technology spouting /48s for everyone > on the main list need to stop. --- [email protected] wrote: From: Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> Feel free to come over to ARIN's PPML list and make the policy and the case. -------------------------------------------------------- What I'm saying is the high-level folks on the list (many of which I've come to trust over the years) need to stop saying it if it's not allowed, but this is not the list for that. I will probably send something to the main list as soon as I can think of a way to present it so a religious/flame/etc fest doesn't occur, but all the folks at my level don't spend too much time thinking about how to assure everyone gets a /48 and, at the same time, only have one entry in the BGP tables in the future. I spent way too much time on that trying to assure I'm being a good netizen. scott _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
