On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:23:03PM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Shrdlu wrote:
[snip]
> > At the risk of sounding too much like the cranky retiree that I am, I
> > would like to see something added into the monthly posting that
> > specifically states something similar to this:
> >
> > "If you need to put OT (for Off Topic) in front of your subject, NANOG
> > is the wrong place for your post."
> >
> > If something is Off Topic, share it with your friends, not the 17k
> > readers of the North American Network Operators Group.
Sounds logical to me. Currently, I find such self-identification a
good filter hook.
> While I generally agree, I look at NANOG as more of a community than an
> operational group these days, and some off-topic (not this one) are not
> necessarily a bad thing.
Got an AUP adjustment to suggest to accommodate that use of the nanog@
list? Or maybe we should revive the 'multiple nanog lists should exist'
discussion again?
Cheers,
Joe
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
