I believe everyone in the community would be interested in knowing the top 10 (5?) reasons why this is being proposed and why it is a good idea at this time.
-manish (definitely speaking for myself and not my employer) On Apr 14, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Steve Gibbard wrote: > I'm wondering if there's any more information available about the > efforts > to separate NANOG from Merit (as announced by Steve Feldman this > morning > in mail to the main NANOG list). > > It sounds like there's already an effort to incorporate an > organization. > What sort of staff and budget is it expected to need? Where would > it be > based? Are there specific people lined up to run it, or is that > more of > an implementation detail than is being addressed now? > > I understand these things take time, and that the official transition > proposal won't be released for a few months. Mostly I guess I'm just > looking for raw data to satisfy my curiosity. Steering Committee > minutes, > if that's where this is being discussed, would be fine. But it > looks like > the most recent minutes on the Steering Committee website are from > February 9, and don't mention this effort. > > Thanks for all the work on this. It was sounding from discussions > at the > Austin NANOG as if such a separation might be the right thing to > do. I'm > not questioning the decision; just wanting a better view of the > process. > > Thanks, > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
