like you, i am an 'outsider' to this process, which i see as a feature not a bug. but i have a slightly different take.
the transition is a process that has been going on slowly for years. this is just another step. but it is different in that it involves business, financial, rights in data, and personnel negotiations which are just not appropriate to be carried on in public. otoh, i agree that pronouncements from on high are not a good social strategy in this community. and perhaps a bit of arrogance can be detected in our peers who are moving this forward. luckily, none of the rest of us suffer from arrogance. :) now that much of this is out in the open, i presume we will be better informed. though, to be honest, despite it probably taking a lot of work on steve and crew's part to keep us informed, i am likely to hit delete a lot. i am even more overloaded than usual these daze. i figure it'll be a fun community meeting i sf. i suggest we go back to serving the alcohol first. :) randy _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
