On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Joe Provo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:39:51AM -0700, Steve Feldman wrote: >> On Jun 14, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>>> For those interested, the "NANOG Transition Plan" session, scheduled >>>> for 4:30-6:00pm Monday, will be webcast. >>> >>> ahem. i presume this will not interfere with the webcasting of the >>> security session. >> >> The security session (as with most BOFs/tracks) are not typically >> webcast or recorded, in order not not discourage candid conversation. >> It's been that way as long as I can remember. > > I believe what was an economic concern (back when getting more cameras > was such a one) originally kept non-plenary off camera. These days, > talk submitters (I believe) have a tickbox to select if/if not, and > both peering and security moderators tend to tick "not". > > What I'd love to see would be an icon or column on the agenda showing > per-talk if it is intended to be streamed (ie, the submitter's selection > be propagated through to the community) such that remote participants > can know in advamce if this or that item will be available to them.
+1 (I don't normally do <AOL> posts, but I figured it was important for the PC to know there was support for this idea.) -- TTFN, patrick _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
