On 04.07.10 1:27, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 2010-07-03 13:08, Andy Davidson wrote: > >> On 3 Jul 2010, at 04:29, Simon Lyall wrote: >> >> >>> Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1] >>> meetings outside of North America (which I doubt) >>> >> No, don't. The rest of the world already has $regionNOG. If Nanog becaome >> WorldNOG, someone would make, err, NANOG again. >> > Part of the reason that the rest of the world that *nog is because > people came to nanog found the format useful and made it their own, or > because nanog participants went there and helped set them up. >
strange for me - as two or three years ago when I first time attended NANOG - I was first and last guy from Russia and - in principle - from exSU who attended NANOG (excapt emigrants) - it doesn't means that nobody on the list - but nanog image - like flaming list... regards, Dima > we can see from the number of new attendees we get everytime we have a > meeting that geogrphic proximity plays heavy role in the utility of nogs. > > >> Andy >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nanog-futures mailing list >> Nanog-futures@nanog.org >> https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > Nanog-futures@nanog.org > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
