>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Weeks [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:04 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for
>NewNOG'smembership structure
>
>
>
>--- [email protected] wrote:
>From: "Brian Johnson" <[email protected]>
>
>As long as a student is a full-time student, looks good to me.
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Two folks have mentioned this full-time-student-only thing so far and I
have
>to ask: Why do they need to be s full time student?  What about, for
example,
>the guy that's working full time to support his family, going to school
part time
>and would like to be part of the NANOG community?
>
>scott
>

Scott,

So if this person is working full-time, why should he/she get a
discount? If you say it's because he/she will have less money due to his
attendance in a school, this then becomes an argument on whether there
needs to be a charity for people who cannot afford the fees.

For the record, I would be fine with a reduced rate student membership
that gives access to meeting discounts and allows for them to identify
themselves as members, but does not allow them to participate in
elections.

- Brian J.

* Please note that all list members and archive readers may consider
themselves Recipients of this message, in reference to the appended
notice.  (I don't add it myself and can't control it, sorry.)



 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
Any unauthorized review,
copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message. Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Reply via email to