Speaking of gmail keyboard shortcuts, did you by any chance see this yet.  
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/6594

From: Shawn L via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org>
Date: Wednesday, 19 March 2025 at 4:21 AM
To: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@lists.nanog.org>
Cc: Shawn L <sha...@up.net>
Subject: [NANOG] Re: The Network CLI -- Love it ? Hate it? Needed?


"Grew up" on elm and vi (someone please make a gmail addon that supports VI 
keys) -- CLI all the way.

I will admit (grudgingly) that there are some things that a GUI is more suited 
for.  It can be a lot easier to visualize traffic flows with graphs, etc. 
rather than packet counters.

There is also a lot of new gear where just putting a port on a vlan and 
accepting un-tagged traffic becomes a 10 line config in cli.  Who thought this 
was a good idea?  Yes, I can do it with 10 clicks in the GUI, but I don't want 
to, I want to blow a standardized config on it, then just make a couple of 
tweaks.





-----Original Message-----
From: "borg--- via NANOG" <nanog@lists.nanog.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 6:11pm
To: nanog@lists.nanog.org
Cc: b...@uu3.net
Subject: [NANOG] Re: The Network CLI -- Love it ? Hate it? Needed?



CLI forever ;) But more seriously. CLI is great, its quick, can
run on toaster and its easya automated using scripting
(generate, replace, preprocess).

I like CLI to the point that my docs stuff runs under CLI terminal.
The GUI is only used for visualizers.
I hope that CLI will stay for a long time...


---------- Original message ----------

From: Mark Prosser via NANOG <nanog@lists.nanog.org>
To: nanog@lists.nanog.org
Cc: Mark Prosser <m...@zealnetworks.ca>
Subject: [NANOG] The Network CLI -- Love it ? Hate it? Needed?
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:05:33 -0400

Hi NANOG community,

I posed this question in several chat groups, but I'd like to get your opinions.

Do you love the CLI? Do you hate the CLI? Would you -- or do you already --
enjoy a world where you never need to touch the CLI, to manage your network?

This applies to both provisioning and troubleshooting; to which, you may have
different answers.

So far, I've seen a variety of replies around the usual "should/must/must
not/should not".

Warm regards,

--
Mark Prosser
// E: m...@zealnetworks.ca
// W: https://zealnetworks.ca

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/GNZX57LVD4XP2VIZTEQFBRGARHH6DVJC/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/M7MASHV2OR3L764U6KHPZBKG7NELBPVW/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/DXLGLBTJEPXOZF77UVKY7IYCSDTMMU5P/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/T6TVCGBI64FN5HFIFNNPJXTKNCHSTIV6/

Reply via email to