On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:37 AM Malte Tashiro via NANOG
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 3/22/25 01:53, Chris Woodfield via NANOG wrote:
> > Fair point and you appear to be correct. I’ll caveat I’m speaking without 
> > concrete data, but I suspect that there are enough routes not held in 
> > RIR-hosted route servers that dropping the unauthenticated IRRs would be… 
> > impactful.
>
> In the RIPE Connect-WG there are efforts to establish a BCP document to only 
> use RIR IRRs for filtering.

Note that authenticating is not exclusive to RIR IRRs. TC does that
too, using RIR/NIR published objects.


Rubens
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QRBKOFL6WTOJ2GMY4IEOVTDTX5HXUZD6/

Reply via email to