On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:37 AM Malte Tashiro via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/22/25 01:53, Chris Woodfield via NANOG wrote: > > Fair point and you appear to be correct. I’ll caveat I’m speaking without > > concrete data, but I suspect that there are enough routes not held in > > RIR-hosted route servers that dropping the unauthenticated IRRs would be… > > impactful. > > In the RIPE Connect-WG there are efforts to establish a BCP document to only > use RIR IRRs for filtering.
Note that authenticating is not exclusive to RIR IRRs. TC does that too, using RIR/NIR published objects. Rubens _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QRBKOFL6WTOJ2GMY4IEOVTDTX5HXUZD6/
