Meaning fixing Puck or the divorce of Outages from Puck?
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "virendra rode via NANOG" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: "virendra rode" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 1:19:28 PM Subject: Re: outages list badly broken, flooding messages I want to sincerely apologize for the current state, this situation should not have unfolded in this manner. Our original intention was to conduct a gradual migration to minimize any disruption to the list. However, given the persistent challenges we’ve encountered with PUCK (Mailman), we are now opting for a decisive big bang cutover to ensure we move forward effectively and efficiently. Thank you for your understanding as we navigate this transition. I will provide additional updates soon. /vrode On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 12:26 -0400, Glenn McGurrin via NANOG wrote: > I've already received 76 copies of > "Re: [Outages-discussion] Lists dead - after action report?" > and continue receiving them every few minutes, apologies, 77 copies > now, > this is clearly badly broken, I do understand this is a volunteer run > list, but normally I do want to receive notifications as it's > generally > important if it's on this list, but currently I'm looking at having > to > block the list as it's sending my notifications nuts. > > > Also as an aside, I'd hesitated offering this before, not feeling > like I > was known enough or had enough standing in the community for it to be > accepted and used, but if help is needed figuring out the issues, or > if > it would help the community to have a backup list, running mailman or > potentially for added diversity running a different mailing list > software, it's been a bit but I've used sympa before as well as > mailman > to run lists, I'm happy to host a secondary backup list(s) to offer > some > extra redundancy to the community (or if people really wanted to have > someone take over the main I'm willing to, but I'm not asking for > that > or expecting anyone wants that), I know some mention has been made in > a > thread somewhere about adding redundancy to the list but nothing > about > the form of that redundancy. > > FWIW up to 96 copies now as I write this, it's been going on for > about > an hour and a half at this point, I held of sending anything > initially > hoping it would be jumped on and at least the sending shut down even > if > that meant taking any remaining online part of the list down for now > until there was time to fix it, as I get it, it's Sunday, people have > plans, etc, at this point all I'd ask to be expedited is shutting it > down until such time as people have time to fix it, not for people to > abandon plans on a Sunday to root cause this and fully fix it. > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/76B3ECDZIUCYS5ETGZ6CNMUTXTBYFGVR/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/A72XBAUV4HMLKV36J3QCW6SD62LUEOKQ/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TKQFEC6THGNPQOEUS4RK3M4KBIVXSK7U/
