On Sun, Jul 6, 2025, at 10:47 AM, William Herrin via NANOG wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 7:11 AM Rich Kulawiec via NANOG
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We can't have nice things generously built for the common good any more
> > because there are too many selfish and greedy thugs who don't care about
> > anything except their own wealth, power, and egos.
> 
> I've wondered if it'd work to place invisible links in the page and
> then block the source for while any time one of the invisible links is
> clicked. Just the classic one-pixel transparent graphic but with a
> link that the log reaper understands to mean "bot was here."
> 
> Haven't tried it. Nearly all of my content is static so I don't have
> enough of a crawler problem to bother.

For the crawler mitigations I've personally been involved with, this would not 
have worked. The source IPs numbered at least in the tens of thousands. They 
didn't repeat; each source IP made one request and was never seen again. They 
didn't aggregate together into prefixes we could filter. They didn't use any 
common identifier we could find to filter on, including the user-agent (which 
were valid-looking and randomized).

In my case, we were able to simply put 99% of the site behind a login, which 
mitigated the problem. Many sites don't have that option..

Dan
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/P36YXFPM4ES6WQMOKVWHQDIP6L6JA2MX/

Reply via email to