As long as you advertise more specific routes, your routes will always win. So 
not a problem that I can see.

 -mel

> On Aug 30, 2025, at 5:57 AM, Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> According to RIPEStat, 2400::/12 hasn't been seen since Oct 2023, from
> AS13030 (Init7).
> 
> I also cannot seem to see any recent announcement of that anywhere in the
> usual sources, or my internal data. I would say this was an error on
> Qrator's part.
> 
> In that case, what more do I must do?
> 
> 
> Although it didn't seem to happen here, best practice is to always announce
> 100% of your allocated IPs at all times.  This provides protection against
> someone announcing an umbrella and pulling traffic for any uncovered space.
> It's not perfect , but protects against general stupid.
> 
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 2:59 AM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Gurus,
>> 
>> 
>> Radar tool by Qrator [Reference: https://radar.qrator.net ] claims that
>> Zenlayer Inc. [AS4229] is “umbrella-ing” me by announcing ‘2400::/12’ on
>> top of my more-specific address block.
>> The tool classifies it as a type of hijacking.
>> [Disclaimer: apologies to Zenlayer if you didn’t do it; but that’s the
>> information I received]
>> My neighboring organization also has a more-specific block that falls under
>> The Umbrella too.
>> 
>> However, other tools (https://stat.ripe.net ,
>> https://irrexplorer.nlnog.net
>> , https://bgp.he.net , etc.) seem unable to see that particular
>> announcement.
>> 
>> Questions:
>> 1. Is Qrator claim true? (because I have already tried but cannot verify)
>> 2. If so, should I be concerned?
>> Even though I already ROA-ed *and* IRR-ed my own block, but if “the other
>> end” doesn’t validate, it won’t do any good, correct?
>> (Oh, yeah, the other end also has to somehow “not see” my longer-prefix.
>> But that can happen as well, no?)
>> 3. In that case, what more do I must do?
>> 
>> I would extremely appreciate someone helping me out on this matter.
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Pirawat.
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>> 
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GT2M54NGQQHRE7IU63ECEOMVTGH7FRIW/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/47LPGUEA2E2LV3RIRZGEF35KC6SPQ53L/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/D52IYCHZULYXWQCCAOQQJHUFPG6SDBKT/

Reply via email to