*nods* and I suppose for companies whose coverage I overlap with, but don't 
serve my main office (such as Mediacom or Charter when I'm in Comcast land), I 
can get the service ordered to a willing Chamber of Commerce or something, and 
then drop an FXO device so that I can "be present".



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Shawn L via NANOG" <[email protected]>
To: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Shawn L" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2025 9:57:06 AM
Subject: Re: Genius or Ridiculous?


It's not necessarily a bad idea.  We see odd voice stuff all the time and 
having lines that don't use or switch can be helpful with troubleshooting.
 
For example, Spectrum loves to release a number (after a port out) but forget 
to remove it from their switch.  So from the customer's point of view, 
"something's wrong because some people can't call me".  
 
Having one of their lines allows us the ability to troubleshoot it a lot faster 
and get a ticket opened.
 
Shawn


-----Original Message-----
From: "Mike Hammett via NANOG" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2025 10:23am
To: "Matthew Petach" <[email protected]>
Cc: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]>, "Mike 
Hammett" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Genius or Ridiculous?



Well, primarily it's the voice service that needs troubleshooting, which is 
harder to do in the fashion you describe. I just figured Internet service was 
cheap enough if you were already getting voice.

Although that does give me an idea on the Internet... get a line on each and 
then put a Mikrotik or Raspberry Pi and a RIPE probe on each. Then anything I 
could likely ever want to test, including making a testing platform available 
to the rest of the world. That isn't a very high number of test points on each 
of those networks.



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Petach" <[email protected]>
To: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>, "Mike Hammett" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2025 8:20:36 PM
Subject: Re: Genius or Ridiculous?




Could you leverage the RIPE Atlas probe infrastructure to give you the answers 
you need? 
There are probes on Comcast (868), Frontier (15), AT&T (46), Verizon (54), 
T-mobile (29). 


What types of troubleshooting do you generally need to do? 


Matt 




On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 1:53 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < [email protected] 
> wrote: 


Sure, but then I have to bother other people. That's what I'm doing now, but it 
kinda sucks asking someone else to help you with your job. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > 
To: "North American Network Operators Group" < [email protected] > 
Cc: "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2025 3:25:22 PM 
Subject: Re: Genius or Ridiculous? 


Find a friend with the service instead of subscribing. 


On Sat, Aug 30, 2025, 4:21 PM Mike Hammett via NANOG < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


My current project is a voice-related project, but how ridiculous would it be 
to get a line of service from my competitors at my main office for me to do 
diagnostics from? Internet from Comcast, Frontier, etc. Voice from Frontier, 
Comcast, AT&T wireless, VZW, and T-Mobile? 

I'm currently in a situation where I have to engage customers (or the family of 
employees) to place test calls for me to collect data on because I can't do it 
any other way. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 



_______________________________________________ 
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TXUNX4V5MI7TAKGJ3NFNUQW6NKZFIEAL/
 

_______________________________________________ 
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/APBIVX7A5JGNFBIKYJOT6LZE3U46JOCW/
 

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZGE6R7O45J7RKG4ZO64W46B3GOSVJLB2/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MWYKRHMXEXVKZHFJGDNCSSJIKHTDFH4U/


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/GW4OCYER4UCEM4ZQCSOGK2J4RN2JCL6A/

Reply via email to