Mel Beckman via NANOG wrote on 26/09/2025 06:33:
Instead you configure one of the available hash-based distribution
functions the two endpoints have in common.
[...]
In my own experience, packet loss on Cisco-Juniper LACP links has
arisen from inconsistent or incompatible configurations.
this analysis is straight down wrong. The hashing algos on each side of a LAG bundle are entirely independent of each other and there is no problem whatever with using different hashing algos on each side.

Nick
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/G7N6AI3F6EVS4R5PI7PUL2L2BLWTQ5GP/

Reply via email to