I'm not too sure how often scheduled updates generally occur, but I would
hope in the order of days, not weeks or months.

Good luck,
Steve

On Wed, Oct 8, 2025, 10:29 Stephen Griffin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I found "Maxstack" also was wrong. So, we SWIP'd back in August, is this
> typical for them to be so wrong for so long? I have folks complaining about
> being geoblocked to BBC as well... :(
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 6:37 AM Stephen Griffin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is odd that they still do, we SWIP'd a while ago, but I filled out the
>> form. Will see what happens.
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025, 06:07 Steve Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe they happen to be using ipapi?
>>>
>>> https://ipapi.co/
>>>
>>> Only mentioning it because that looks like the only major geoop db that
>>> still lists that block as Boston.
>>>
>>> Steve 👋
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025, 03:45 Stephen Griffin via NANOG <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, I have a site in London. We recently changed from PA space to PI
>>>> space.
>>>> I SWIP'd the new space 155.33.8.0/23 to reflect our London location.
>>>>
>>>> However, on-site support staff are claiming that Apple Support shows
>>>> them
>>>> in Boston in the US (our headquarters) without an option to pick the UK,
>>>> and are demanding that we go back to PA space, which is both impractical
>>>> and a bad technical option.
>>>>
>>>> I have attempted to get them to log a ticket with Apple in order to
>>>> determine why they believe our London location is in the US, but am just
>>>> getting back "you broke it, fix!" type responses.
>>>>
>>>> So, does anyone have experience with Apple's geolocation? Is accurate
>>>> information on the network whois insufficient? Is it because the ASN
>>>> shows
>>>> the US (which would likely be incredibly inaccurate and somewhat
>>>> difficult
>>>> to change, I think)?
>>>>
>>>> I suggested maybe it was a cookie or related to the service contract or
>>>> something, but those have been summarily rejected, so I am somewhat
>>>> running
>>>> out of ideas.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Stephen
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NANOG mailing list
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3ZXJUWRVRYDUDSTN6HTUUAYV5FRJHSF5/
>>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2BOOTFIICJM3KDJTPJCLRPWUYLZFUWY7/

Reply via email to