I'd be curious if anyone knows why the requirement was removed? Who thought that was a necessary and good thing?
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 8:42 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill- > > My committee affiliations are not relevant. That being said if I am ever > responding on behalf of one of my committee roles I always make that very > clear. > > The information in question is publicly available on the NANOG website. In > fact, you found the link yourself. Any plain reading of that webpage > answered your direct question as to what the current guidance is. > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 9:34 AM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 6:16 AM Tom Beecher <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> What should we > > >> consider to be the current guidance? > > > > > > You linked to the currently published mailing list guidelines, > therefore > > > you have already answered your own question. There is no current > > > requirement for real names to be used on the mailing list. > > > > You're on the NANOG Moderation Committee? No? Maybe let someone who is > > think about it and offer an answer. > > > > Regards, > > Bill Herrin > > > > > > -- > > For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/ > > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RWUBHGVRC7Q7WVU5NC27X5ZXFD4SU2ZW/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PV5XZS5VMOQS472HTOH5MNZBVYQ5TQ3E/
