Thank you. I wasn't aware of that improvement. Absolutely massive improvement in observed behaviour, penalties appear to be no more than 50% which is pretty tough ask, if you still want to keep good performance on the common case, which is legitimate packet loss.
Still bit hilarious justification behind the fix, as it appears as if dropbox and/or samsung strategically reorder under some design they have. Despite it being 'fixed', you would still not want to give away 50% of your investment to congestion control technicalities and we can still fairly argue that if your design strategically reorders, it is broken design. On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 at 14:26, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Saku Ytti via NANOG <[email protected]> writes: > > > Even if it is unicasted, performance is destroyed due to reordering. > > All modern TCP stacks use cubic for congestion control, which > > considers reorder a packet loss. > > This is not quite true any longer. Linux implements RACK-TLP (RFC8985) > which prevents short-term reordering (such as that caused by ECMP) from > being interpreted as a congestion event. > > It seems Windows does too, these days: > https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/networkingblog/algorithmic-improvements-boost-tcp-performance-on-the-internet/2347061 > > -Toke > -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RHNLMHN5A26CGLV6ZNFFC3MF77Z3JNCB/
