VyOS on SuperMicro and Lanner baremetal works pretty damn good.

Been running VyOS on SuperMicro for my BGP routers for about 6 years now. No 
problems yet.

-Mike

> On Feb 9, 2026, at 10:03, Mike Hammett via NANOG <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> It wouldn't surprise me at all to hear you know people that put OpenBGPd 
> onto an Arista.  ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
> 
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Smyth via NANOG" <[email protected]>
> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Tom Smyth" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 9, 2026 12:00:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Router Recommendations
> 
> Hi Mike,
> how is it going ?
> we are using arista and are pretty happy with them  and some folks I know
> are using portable OpenBGPd on them  and reported good satisfaction...
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 17:47, Michel Blais via NANOG <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> We've been using Edgecore and UfiSpace with OcNOS for several years and are
>> pretty happy with those. It's not only the selling price that is affordable
>> but also support licences that are cheap enough to not even mind renewing
>> those.
>> 
>> If you are not already aware of, you can look at the OcNOS features matrix
>> that lets you know which feature is supported by models.
>> 
>> If I may, for a eBGP use case, make sure the device you chose has a TCAM
>> because cheaper models with the most attractive selling price often have a
>> very limited number of routes, which is fine for IGP in a small network,
>> but far to be able to handle eBGP full routing tables.
>> ---
>> Michel Blais
>> Targo Communications
>> 
>> 
>> Le lun. 9 févr. 2026, à 12 h 10, Mike Hammett via NANOG <
>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>> 
>>> I'm looking for new BGP routers. I'm currently running Mikrotik, which
>> has
>>> served me well so far, but looking at interface speed, count, FIB size,
>>> etc. and they just aren't going to cut it.
>>> 
>>> I'm looking for:
>>> • Has at least 6x 100G ports
>>> • Has a smattering of 10G/25G ports
>>> • Has meaningful packet buffers
>>> • Routes in hardware at least 2m routes combined of IPv4 and IPv6, more
>> is
>>> better
>>> • Has reasonably low power usage, I don't need 1 kw going to a router
>>> • Is cost-effective
>>> • Used is fine
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I like how the MX301 looks, but it's way more than I'd want to spend,
>>> primarily because there really isn't a used market for them yet.
>>> Arista and Cisco NCS are close, but to check all of the boxes, you're up
>>> to about $15k - $20k. To get to $5k or less, you're compromising on at
>>> least two of the things I'm looking for.
>>> EdgeCore and UfiSpace may have some models that are in the $5k - $8k
>>> range, once you purchase OcNOS.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd have no problem with the EdgeCore and UfiSpace direction, but I
>> wanted
>>> to make sure I wasn't leaving anything out of consideration.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>> 
>>> Midwest-IX
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NANOG mailing list
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ANH4UUU6K3CMCSWSBHAALWTYLHK32OGG/
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>> 
>> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7MEYBWHTY3Y2ERCWZONT345SNS3VC2UB/
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kindest regards,
> Tom Smyth.
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/XFOZUZTPX6RAQO7GOBGFYFMIKEVO5UQP/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5UXRU7PGJMHNCBXWYMEODNEVWZKLD2V4/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/WRBH5WH6RQ4VQSKN3OWGCQOHXK4MCI6I/

Reply via email to