You are making a big ask Elmar, by your absolutely wild rationale, hope it'll pay out :)
On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 at 10:08, Elmar K. Bins via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, well, turns out I'm too stupid to check recipients before sending. > Please let's not start an OS war... > > Elmar. > > [email protected] (Elmar K. Bins via NANOG) wrote: > > > Hi Drew, I'll answer in private to not reincinerate the OS wars. > > We're running tac_plus, and have been since... forever. > > We have not painted ourselves into a corner by using Linux, though. > > FreeBSD has a still-maintained package which works well; it needs a restart > > every two months or so, but is happy otherwise. > > > > I know this won't help you much, except maybe to think a bit outside the > > Linux box. > > > > Cheers, > > Elmar. > > > > [email protected] (Drew Weaver via NANOG) wrote: > > > > > Howdy. > > > > > > I imagine that this is an issue that has come up before but I am having > > > an issue finding how anyone else handled it. (Unless everyone is still > > > running tac_plus on RHEL7) > > > > > > I'm trying to migrate some tac plus instances to a new Linux distro that > > > apparently doesn't support tcp_wrappers and I'm having trouble both > > > compiling it and making an RPM for it. > > > > > > I've tried both the original https://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ and the > > > now sadly abandoned Facebook version https://github.com/facebook/tac_plus > > > > > > If there is another tacacs+ solution everyone has moved to that I am > > > unaware of please enlighten me. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > -Drew > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/H4EIWLBDDXVRVZQXCGC43BZPYSACVKSP/ -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/V2FPMMDU73NDFT4CU456B3D7J5XIVCY2/
