Delighted to see this thread on NANOG. Two decades after it should have been slammed but hey ho
The problem of course is that Governments are starting to think geo location is an architecturally dependable part of the network. In an era of the Online Safety Act in UK that becomes a serious risk to enforcing falsity as truth by law and Treaty obligation. So what's to be done? Christian John Curran via NANOG <[email protected]> writes: >> On Feb 17, 2026, at 12:18 PM, Abdullah DevRel of IPinfo via NANOG >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> …. >> The limitation you’re identifying is real. We could do more >> proactive outreach when we detect conflicts. That's valuable >> feedback. Would you recommend a specific approach - perhaps flagging >> high-confidence conflicts in a report ISPs could opt into? > > “I know what I don’t know” (i.e. there’s no reason my opinion here > would be either well-informed or particularly relevant) – but I am > certain that some of the operators on this list will have timely > suggestions… > > Thanks! > /John > > p.s. Disclaimers: my views alone; may cause drowsiness – use caution when > operating heavy machinery. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZXIH5JHM666XI4C63RQF3MNC3FNMZNJK/ -- Christian de Larrinaga _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/3OD2FDKZ2I5XSZKPJU5AYA736OFQDK7J/
