Please explain how. The only form of PAT that I'm familiar with translates source ports, not destination ports. It is the latter that would be required in this situation.
Cisco Pix, at least, has a feature that could do this on traffic passing through it - "port redirection". Of course, this would require sending the messages through an additional box. See: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/28.html Tony Rall Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Holmes, Daniel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Configure SNMP for non udp 161 port you could use PAT -----Original Message----- From: Holmes, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Configure SNMP for non udp 161 port Does anyone know off hand how to configure a cisco router to respond to SNMP v1/v2 requests on a udp port other than 161 (default) Thanks - Dan
