>Paul's statement about CEF is interesting. It's probably the first public >statement I've ever heard where someone was praising CEF. Usually >discussions about CEF are accompanied by liberal amounts of swearing... Just my anecdotal 2 cents: 2@Cisco 4000M, 4 T1's, load balanced. 5 meg of IP traffic, no filters. no ip cef - 90% CPU - router on its' knees ip cef - 40% router alive and kicking Other than the memery overhead CEF adds to BGP, CEF is painless, and worthwhile.
- Re: packet reordering at e... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: packet reordering at e... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: packet reordering at e... Paul Vixie
- RE: packet reordering at e... Jim Forster
- Re: packet reordering at e... Craig Partridge
- Re: packet reordering at e... Jesper Skriver
- Re: packet reordering at e... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: packet reordering at e... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: packet reordering at e... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: packet reordering at excha... Jesper Skriver
- Re: Load balancing in routers Donn Lasher
- Re: Load balancing in routers Chris Woodfield
- Re: Load balancing in routers Tony Tauber
- RE: Load balancing in routers Gironda, Andre
- Re: Load balancing in routers Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Load balancing in routers Alex Rubenstein
- Re: Load balancing in routers Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Load balancing in routers Mark Kent
- Re: Load balancing in routers Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Load balancing in routers Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Load balancing in routers Rodney Dunn