On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 10:33 , Steven J. Sobol wrote: > > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Deepak Jain wrote: > >> I'm more concerned that if the major metropolitan markets deploying >> GPRS >> all use NAT, then the Next Big Thing won't ever happen on GPRS devices. >> Customers won't jump ship if they have no where to jump to. > > The only people who'd be deploying GPRS are GSM cellular providers, no? The concern exists regardless of the specifics of the always-on, cellular packet radio protocols being used, surely? > [GSM coverage is patchy in the US] It's prevalent elsewhere. I'd be surprised if there aren't more GSM subscribers in the world than non-GSM subscribers. Joe
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Roland Dobbins
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Michael Painter
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Joe Abley
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? michael thomas guldan
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman