On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:22:39PM -0700, PJ wrote: > Are you now operating under the premise that scans != anything but the > prelude to an attack? Sorry if I missed it earlier in the thread, but > I would hate to think any legitimate scanning of a network or host > would result in a false positive. Even more, I would hate to see the > advocation of a hostile reaction to what, so far, is not considered a > crime.
So you can think of a perfectly legitimate reason to scan someone else's netblocks on specific TCP ports? -c