Sounds like either way, the consensus was that ICANN has to go......which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Very interesting.
rf > From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:28 -0500 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Discussion of Results > > > Proposal #1 (which passed by over 2/3rds - 67.9%) expresses the sense of the > GA that > DOC should re-bid the ICANN contract and forget ICANN completely > > Proposal #2 (which passed by 75%) expresses to ICANN the desire that they > reform in a meaningful way, and if they don't, that the DOC should replace > ICANN. > > Interesting.... > > ---- > AGN Domain Name Services, Inc http://www.adns.net > Since 1995. The Registry for .AMERICA, .EARTH, .LION, .USA and .Z > Define yourself or Be Defined. > Censorship-free GA list at : http://dns-o.org/mailman/listinfo/ga > >