> Path latency doesn't change much, you can determine > this with very few probes. > . . . . > Much like web spidering, some simple common sense can help keep probes > from becoming a hassle: > . . . . > * Consider what is the smallest unit of "distinct network topology" you > need to map. A very reasonable number would be a /24. We have been studying these issues as part of the IDMaps project and have two reports quantifying our results. If interested, you can download our papers from: http://idmaps.eecs.umich.edu/papers/rtt.ps.gz http://idmaps.eecs.umich.edu/papers/ap.pdf Cheers, Amgad
- Re: operational: icmp echo out of cont... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: operational: icmp echo out of ... E.B. Dreger
- Re: operational: icmp echo ou... Jeff Mcadams
- Re: operational: icmp ech... Mike Tancsa
- Re: operational: icmp ech... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: operational: icmp echo... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: operational: icmp echo... John Kristoff
- Re: operational: icmp echo... John Kristoff
- IWF was: RE: operational: ... Deepak Jain
- RE: operational: icmp echo out of control? James Smith
- Re: operational: icmp echo out of control? Amgad Zeitoun
- Re: operational: icmp echo out of control? Amgad Zeitoun
- RE: operational: icmp echo out of control? Rowland, Alan D
- RE: operational: icmp echo out of control? Greg A. Woods