Air Travel: Limited resources (gates), public safety issues, public infrastructure used (ATC system). Commercial Fishing: Limited resources, environmental issues Conventional Telco: Pre-existing monopoly using what was essentially public ifrastructure. Same goes for Cable TV. How do IP networks fall into any of these categories? It's not like we are going to overfish our BGP sessions or crash routers into things. - Daniel Golding > Paul Vixie Said... > so, the reason i am puzzled is that while some of those could be argued by > some people, they _are_not_being_argued_about_. there's a blind eye here. > > none of the following industries would be allowed the kind of > "self regulation" > currently practiced in the IP carriage field: air travel, > commercial fishing, > leased line telco, or switched voice telco. we're treated in a hands-off > fashion that absolutely boggles the mind. >
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on the ... Vadim Antonov
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on ... Stephen J. Wilcox
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely... E.B. Dreger
- Valid ip address ? JothirLatha Jaganathan
- Re: Valid ip address ? Joe Provo
- Re: Valid ip address ? E.B. Dreger
- Re: Valid ip address ? Stephen Griffin
- Re: Valid ip address ? JothirLatha Jaganathan
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on ... Paul Vixie
- Re:fundamentalist's opinion-- Vixie-- Re: ... jnelson
- Re: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Luyer
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- Re: Sprint peering policy Rizzo Frank
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex
- RE: Sprint peering policy Paul A Flores
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz
- Game Theory (was: RE: Sprint peering p... Scott A Crosby
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal