On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:35:01PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > No. It is precisely the public e-mail messages which should > always be signed, since they are the ones likely to reach the largest > audience, and the ones that are likely to have the biggest negative > impact if they are successfully spoofed.
what is amazing is that if this was really that important.. how is it that mankind has gotten this far without the need of authenticating every piece of communication. but what this all has to do with nanog, i don't understand at all.
