So as not to cause confusion, the complete current JUNOS martian list is:
0.0.0.0/8 127.0.0.0/8 128.0.0.0/16 191.255.0.0/16 192.0.0.0/24 223.255.255.0/24 240.0.0.0/4 My questions were on a select portion of these, and a portion of the ones listed in the security appnote on their website. Cheers, -- steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:53 AM To: Stephen Gill Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Juniper security appnote + martians > Now, on to some of Juniper default martians: > 128.0.0.0/16 > 191.255.0.0/16 > 192.0.0.0/24 > 223.255.255.0/24 > > These prefixes seem to be based on > www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iana-special-ipv4-03.txt. I'm > curious what the reasoning is behind selecting these prefixes only. > Also, given that these may be allocated in the future (per the draft) > what are your thoughts on having these in Juniper's default config? > Perhaps these would be good additions to a dynamic (up-to-date) bogon > list instead of a static placement in JUNOS even though they can be > overridden if necessary. > > Thoughts? > -- steve These nets were the "boundary" networks that defined classful delegations. To round it out properly, one should include the following: 0.255.255.0/24 126.0.0.0/24 127.255.255.0/24 ... <and the top end of the "D" space> with the advent of classless addressing (circa 1997) these "martian" spaces are vestigal. They can be assigned although it is unlikely that they will be placed into active use until there is much more of the v4 space delegated. The IANA draft is "retro" by including them as "special". They aren't these days. --bill
