> If the connection fabric between your routers has an MTBF best measured in > hours or days, then you've got bigger problems than you'll solve with LMI. Agreed. However, I think the debate may be over the (un)reliability of routers connected to the exchange, not the exchange itself. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Mike Hughes
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... cowie
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Robert E. Seastrom
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Petri Helenius
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Jared Mauch
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Vadim Antonov
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... David Diaz
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange ... Paul Vixie
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points ma... Alex Rubenstein
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make s... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense... Alex Rubenstein
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make s... Richard A Steenbergen
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make s... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense any... William B. Norton
- Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense... William B. Norton