> > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them. > > > > Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* break. > > > > I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP. > > > > > > Slow convergence. > > > > As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh. I've actually > > been doing it, and now that I'm about to add my 5th router, OSPF is > > looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions. I've heard > > some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the > > route-reflector goes down you're screwed.
What about a well choosen (wrt topo) pair of them... > > Planning on doing away with that pesky IBGP mesh and just redistributing > BGP into OSPF are we Ralph? > > There is so much wrong with the above post that I can't do anything > except hang my head in shame for people running networks everywhere > around the world. > mh > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
