> > >Driver #1 : Sell p00rn via IPv6 only. > > > >Sad but true. Content and use is all there is. > > Remember that multicast never happened either. > How much it would take to "sponsor" free content over multicast to > get it deployed. Donīt know if this would be approvable for government > subsidies though. I am not sure it has to be free. It just has to be available. As long as there is no valuable content in v6 that I can't get in v4 there will be no user drive to change. What might happen is that ISPs start using IPv6 for their (as example) DSL services to work around addressing problems. But that is not a userdriven demand. - kurtis -
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Daniel Golding
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Stephen Sprunk
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Dave Israel
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Mike Leber
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kevin Oberman
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discuss... Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 dis... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 dis... Jeroen Massar
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 dis... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Broadening the IPv6 dis... Jeroen Massar
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
- Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Marshall Eubanks